Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
JAMAarrow_drop_down
JAMA
Article . 1961 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
JAMA
Article . 1998
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Double-Blind Study of the Treatment of Hypertension

Authors: Raymond F. Grenfell; William C. Holland; Arthur H. Briggs;

A Double-Blind Study of the Treatment of Hypertension

Abstract

Antihypertensive agents differ as to the degree of hypotension which results from their use. In an attempt to evaluate various agents, a double-blind study was begun in January, 1956. Seventy-four patients received placebo and ergotoxine alkaloids parenterally. Sixty received placebo and drugs orally. For 59 weeks, parenteral placebo administration caused a significant decrease in systolic pressure. Parenteral drug and placebo administration was followed by a significant decrease in diastolic pressure through the 143rd week. Patients receiving placebo orally experienced no significant change in pressure. Decreases in systolic and diastolic pressure followed oral administration of the ergotoxine alkaloids, reserpine, and a combination of rauwolfia, protoveratrine, and phenoxybenzamine hydrochloride. Dihydroergocornine orally did not decrease the blood pressure.

Keywords

Double-Blind Method, Hypertension, Humans, Antihypertensive Agents, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    40
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
40
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!