Downloads provided by UsageCounts
In this work, we report the set-up and results of the Liver Tumor Segmentation Benchmark (LiTS), which was organized in conjunction with the IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2017 and the International Conferences on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2017 and 2018. The image dataset is diverse and contains primary and secondary tumors with varied sizes and appearances with various lesion-to-background levels (hyper-/hypo-dense), created in collaboration with seven hospitals and research institutions. Seventy-five submitted liver and liver tumor segmentation algorithms were trained on a set of 131 computed tomography (CT) volumes and were tested on 70 unseen test images acquired from different patients. We found that not a single algorithm performed best for both liver and liver tumors in the three events. The best liver segmentation algorithm achieved a Dice score of 0.963, whereas, for tumor segmentation, the best algorithms achieved Dices scores of 0.674 (ISBI 2017), 0.702 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.739 (MICCAI 2018). Retrospectively, we performed additional analysis on liver tumor detection and revealed that not all top-performing segmentation algorithms worked well for tumor detection. The best liver tumor detection method achieved a lesion-wise recall of 0.458 (ISBI 2017), 0.515 (MICCAI 2017), and 0.554 (MICCAI 2018), indicating the need for further research. LiTS remains an active benchmark and resource for research, e.g., contributing the liver-related segmentation tasks in \url{http://medicaldecathlon.com/}. In addition, both data and online evaluation are accessible via \url{www.lits-challenge.com}.
Patrick Bilic, Patrick Christ, Hongwei Bran Li, and Eugene Vorontsov made equal contributions to this work. Published in Medical Image Analysis
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Aplicacions de la informàtica, Image Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers Medical Imaging, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radboud University Medical Center, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Processament del senyal::Processament de la imatge i del senyal vídeo, Benchmark, Article, Computer-Assisted, Segmentation, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Fetge -- Càncer, Humans, Liver tumor, Retrospective Studies, Liver Neoplasms, Deep learning, Benchmarking, Liver -- Cancer, Liver, Benchmark ; Ct ; Deep Learning ; Liver ; Liver Tumor ; Segmentation, Diagnostic imaging, Imatgeria per al diagnòstic, Algorithms, CT, Aprenentatge profund
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Informàtica::Aplicacions de la informàtica, Image Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (cs.CV), Radboudumc 9: Rare cancers Medical Imaging, Computer Science - Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Radboud University Medical Center, Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria de la telecomunicació::Processament del senyal::Processament de la imatge i del senyal vídeo, Benchmark, Article, Computer-Assisted, Segmentation, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Fetge -- Càncer, Humans, Liver tumor, Retrospective Studies, Liver Neoplasms, Deep learning, Benchmarking, Liver -- Cancer, Liver, Benchmark ; Ct ; Deep Learning ; Liver ; Liver Tumor ; Segmentation, Diagnostic imaging, Imatgeria per al diagnòstic, Algorithms, CT, Aprenentatge profund
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 711 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% |
| views | 67 | |
| downloads | 114 |

Views provided by UsageCounts
Downloads provided by UsageCounts