Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
ZENODOarrow_drop_down
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
ZENODO
Dataset . 2025
License: CC BY
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

LAMASUS - Biodiversity estimates for agricultural management and other statistics

Authors: van 't Veen, Hanneke; Cornford, Richard;

LAMASUS - Biodiversity estimates for agricultural management and other statistics

Abstract

We provide key outputs from ‘D5.2 Coefficients of estimated biodiversity responses to land use and maps of conservation priorities’, including estimated model coefficients, biodiversity response functions, and spatially projected biodiversity indicator values. Biodiversity estimates from two different institutes are provided: (i) GLOBIO - Mean species abundance (MSA) estimates for different agricultural management types are provided. (ii) IIASA - Biodiversity intactness index (BII) estimates for different agricultural and forest management types are provided. This dataset has been created as part of LAMASUS Project under the scope of Deliverable 5.2 titled "Coefficients of estimated biodiversity responses to land use and maps of conservation priorities", which can be found here: https://www.lamasus.eu/wp-content/uploads/LAMASUS_D5.2_Coefficients-biodiversity_final.pdf. GLOBIO estimates (MSA): Biodiversity estimates for the LAMASUS deliverable D5.2. The "Statistics.xls" file includes biodiversity estimates and confidence intervals for different types of agricultural management as described in the methodology of "LAMASUS_D5.2_Coefficients-biodiversity_final.pdf". Additionally, the file contains post-hoc test outcomes, estimates for threatened biodiversity, coefficients for relationships over time since the establishment of an agricultural management system, as well as model comparisons with continent as a fixed effect to assess whether spatial variability explains the results. Explanations can be found in the "LAMASUS_D5.2_Coefficients-biodiversity_final.pdf" file. IIASA estimates (BII): Data are split into two file types, ‘BASE’ and ‘OPTIMAL’. BASE refers to outputs from the Base model structure as described in D5.2, using only PREDICTS data (i.e., models presented in Figure 2, PREDICTS weight = 1). OPTIMAL refers to the Optimal model structure described in D5.2, and incorporating our data-integration approach (i.e., models presented in Figures 4, 5, 6, coloured lines, PREDICTS weight = 0.7). Data for all indicators presented in D5.2 (Species richness, Total abundance, Geometric mean abundance, Sørensen, Bray-Curtis, Canberra and the biodiversity intactness index [BII]) are included. However, results for the combination of Optimal and Species richness are missing due to model convergence issues. Within the BASE files, we provide model coefficients (coefficient_estimates.csv, ‘(Intercept)’ corresponds to Primary(-Primary)), response estimates relative to Primary(-Primary) (response_functions.csv), and spatial predictions given the LAMASUS Land Use Management Data Set (See et al., 2025, https://zenodo.org/records/15488011). Spatial predictions are provided for the EU (plus UK) at 1km (eur_1km.tif), NUTS2 (eur_NUTS2.csv), and country (eur_countries.csv) scales, for 2000, 2010 and 2018. Model coefficients and spatial predictions are similarly provided in the OPTIMAL files. Rescaled response estimates are not provided for the Optimal models due to dependence on continuous covariates. However, given the model coefficients, responses can be generated for specific variable combinations.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center