
AbstractBio–nano interfaces are integral to all applications of nanomaterials in biomedicine. In addition to peptide‐ligand‐functionalized nanomaterials, passivation on 2D nanomaterials has emerged as a new regulatory factor for integrin activation. However, the mechanisms underlying such ligand‐independent processes are poorly understood. Here, using graphene oxide passivated with polyethylene glycol (GO‐PEG) as a test bed, a ternary simulation model is constructed that also includes a membrane and both subunits of integrin αvβ8 to characterize GO‐PEG‐mediated integrin activation on the cell membrane in a ligand‐independent manner. Combined with the experimental findings, production simulations of the ternary model show a three‐phase mechanotransduction process in the vertical interaction mode. Specifically, GO‐PEG first induces lipid aggregation‐mediated integrin proximity, followed by transmembrane domain rotation and separation, leading to the extension and activation of extracellular domains. Thus, this study presents a complete picture of the interaction between passivated 2D nanomaterials and cell membranes to mediate integrin activation, and provides insights into the potential de novo design and rational use of novel desirable nanomaterials at diverse bio–nano interfaces.
Integrin beta Chains, Science, Q, Cell Membrane, molecular dynamics simulations, Integrin alphaV, Ligands, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, passivated 2D nanomaterials, Nanostructures, Polyethylene Glycols, integrin activation, Protein Domains, ternary model, Humans, Graphite, conformational changes, Research Articles
Integrin beta Chains, Science, Q, Cell Membrane, molecular dynamics simulations, Integrin alphaV, Ligands, Mechanotransduction, Cellular, passivated 2D nanomaterials, Nanostructures, Polyethylene Glycols, integrin activation, Protein Domains, ternary model, Humans, Graphite, conformational changes, Research Articles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
