
pmid: 21400052
To evaluate the effect on intraocular pressure (IOP) of increased corneal thickness after Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and of non-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) as measured by four different techniques.Twenty-four eyes (22 patients; mean age, 74.0 years) with successful DSAEK (11 eyes) or nDSAEK (13 eyes) treatment at least 3 months prior to testing were enrolled. IOP was measured with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), pneumatonometry, and Tono-Pen XL (Tonopen). Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured by ultrasonic pachymetry. These data were used for statistical analysis.Mean IOP measured by GAT, DCT, pneumatonometry, and Tonopen was 14.4, 13.9, 11.2, and 13.2 mmHg, respectively, in the DSAEK group; and 15.0, 14.4, 12.5, and 14.4 mmHg, respectively, in the nDSAEK group. Correlations between IOP and CCT were not statistically significant in either group. Pressure measured by pneumatonometry was significantly and consistently lower than that obtained by the other three methods.For both DSAEK and nDSAEK, IOP readings by the four tonometers seem to be unrelated to artificially thickened corneas.
Male, Endothelium, Corneal, Cornea, Corneal Transplantation, Automation, Tonometry, Ocular, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty, Intraocular Pressure, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aged
Male, Endothelium, Corneal, Cornea, Corneal Transplantation, Automation, Tonometry, Ocular, Humans, Female, Postoperative Period, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty, Intraocular Pressure, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
