
We assessed the efficacy of Seneca Valley virus (SVV-001), a neuroendocrine cancer-selective oncolytic picornavirus, in primary heterotransplant mouse models of small cell lung cancer (SCLC), including three lines each of classic and variant SCLC. Half-maximal effective concentrations for cell lines derived from three variant heterotransplants ranged from 1.6×10(-3) (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1×10(-3) to 2.5×10(-3)) to 3.9×10(-3) (95% CI = 2.8×10(-3) to 5.5×10(-3)). Sustained tumor growth inhibition in vivo was only observed in variant lines (two-sided Student t test, P < .005 for each). Doses of 10(14) vp/kg were able to completely and durably eradicate tumors in a variant SCLC heterotransplant model in two of six mice. Gene expression profiling revealed that permissive lines are typified by lower expression of the early neurogenic transcription factor ASCL1 and, conversely, by higher expression of the late neurogenic transcription factor NEUROD1. This classifier demonstrates a sensitivity of .89, specificity of .92, and accuracy of .91. The NEUROD1 to ASCL1 ratio may serve as a predictive biomarker of SVV-001 efficacy.
Lung Neoplasms, Gene Expression Profiling, Transplantation, Heterologous, Protein Array Analysis, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, SCID, Picornaviridae, Tropism, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Oncolytic Viruses, Predictive Value of Tests, Cell Line, Tumor, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Animals, Female, Carcinoma, Small Cell
Lung Neoplasms, Gene Expression Profiling, Transplantation, Heterologous, Protein Array Analysis, Mice, Inbred Strains, Mice, SCID, Picornaviridae, Tropism, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Oncolytic Viruses, Predictive Value of Tests, Cell Line, Tumor, Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors, Animals, Female, Carcinoma, Small Cell
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 118 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
