Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A randomized, multicenter phase II study investigating additional weekly cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: Reporting on the efficacy.

Authors: Michel M van den Heuvel; Andrew D. Vincent; Wilma Uyterlinde; Joachim Aerts; Fredirike Koppe; Henk Codrington; Peter W.E. Kunst; +4 Authors

A randomized, multicenter phase II study investigating additional weekly cetuximab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma: Reporting on the efficacy.

Abstract

7019 Background: Modest benefits from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with locally advanced NSCLC warrant more effective treatment regimen. Cetuximab, a monoclonal antibody against the epidermal growth factor receptor has shown activity in NSCLC. Feasibility data and toxicity have been published previously. We report treatment outcome of a multicenter phase II study of the combination of high dose accelerated RT and daily dose cisplatin with or without weekly cetuximab. Methods: Patients with locally advanced NSCLC received accelerated RT (66 Gy in 24 fractions) and concurrent daily cisplatin (6 mg/m2) with (Arm A) or without (Arm B) additional weekly cetuximab (400 mg/m2 loading dose one week prior to the RT start followed by weekly 250 mg/m2). The Objective Local Response Control (OLRC) was determined at 6 and 24 weeks after treatment using response evaluation criteria in solid tumours criteria. Results: Between Feb 2009 and May 2011, 102 patients were included. Median follow-up was 13 months. Patients and tumor characteristics are shows in the Table. Stage distribution was: II (8%), IIIa (51%), and IIIb (40%). The CRT was well tolerated. The OLRC at 24 weeks was 79% in Arm A and 80% in Arm B. The one-year progression free survival and overall survival were 58% (45%-76%) and 76% (64%-91%) for Arm A and 49% (35%-68%) and 72% (58%-89%) for Arm B respectively. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to low dose cisplation CRT does not improve OLRC in an unselected patient cohort but data on longterm disease control and survival are to be awaited. [Table: see text]

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!