Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Etoposide, Methylprednisolone, High-Dose Cytarabine, and Oxaliplatin (ESHAOx) for Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Authors: Sun Jin Sym; Hye Jin Kang; Seung-Hyun Nam; Hoyoung Kim; Seok Jin Kim; Hyeon Seok Eom; Won Seog Kim; +1 Authors

A Multicenter Phase II Trial of Etoposide, Methylprednisolone, High-Dose Cytarabine, and Oxaliplatin (ESHAOx) for Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma.

Abstract

Abstract Etoposide (E), methylprednisolone (S), high-dose cytarabine (HA), and cisplatin (P) (ESHAP) combination is commonly used salvage regimen for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Oxaliplatin (Ox), a new platinum derivative, showed substantially different cytotoxic activity and adverse effects from both cisplatin and carboplatin. In addition, single-agent oxaliplatin was reportedly active in patients with NHL. We conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of ESHAOx combination, substituting oxaliplatin for cisplatin in ESHAP combination, for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL patients. Main eligibility criteria included aggressive NHL and failure to achieve a complete remission or recurrent disease after previous chemotherapy. ESHAOx consisted of E, 40 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4; S, 500 mg on days 1 to 5; HA, 2 g/m2 on day 5; and Ox, 130 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks. Eligible patients were scheduled to receive a maximum of 6 cycles, and high dose chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell rescue allowed. Responses were evaluated every 3 cycles. All patients gave written informed consent before study entry. Between May 2006 and January 2007, 27 patients were enrolled. Nineteen (70%) patients with relapsed, 8 patients with refractory, and 10 (37%) patients with IPI 3–5 were included in this study. A total of 102 cycles were administered for a median number of 4 (range 1–6 cycles) per patient. There were 8 (30%) complete responses and 9 (33%) partial responses, producing an overall response rate of 63% (95% CI, 45–81%). Most common grade 3/4 toxicity of the courses was myelosuppression with including neutropenia (55%) and thrombocytopenia (33%). Non-hematologic toxicity was very favorable. No significant renal and neurotoxicity was demonstrated. There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. The results of ESHAOx combination showed highly antitumor activity and favorable toxicity profile, suggesting it can be used as salvage regimen for relapsed/refractory aggressive NHL patients.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!