
Motivation: The determination of absolute quantities of proteins in biological samples is necessary for multiple types of scientific inquiry. While relative quantification has been commonly used in proteomics, few proteomic datasets measuring absolute protein quantities have been reported to date. Various technologies have been applied using different types of input data, e.g. ion intensities or spectral counts, as well as different absolute normalization strategies. To date, a user-friendly and transparent software supporting large-scale absolute protein quantification has been lacking. Results: We present a bioinformatics tool, termed aLFQ, which supports the commonly used absolute label-free protein abundance estimation methods (TopN, iBAQ, APEX, NSAF and SCAMPI) for LC-MS/MS proteomics data, together with validation algorithms enabling automated data analysis and error estimation. Availability and implementation: aLFQ is written in R and freely available under the GPLv3 from CRAN (http://www.cran.r-project.org). Instructions and example data are provided in the R-package. The raw data can be obtained from the PeptideAtlas raw data repository (PASS00321). Contact: lars.malmstroem@imsb.biol.ethz.ch Supplementary information: Supplementary Data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Proteomics, 1303 Biochemistry, Proteins, 142-005 142-005, Applications Notes, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, 1312 Molecular Biology, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 2613 Statistics and Probability, 2605 Computational Mathematics, Algorithms, Software, 1703 Computational Theory and Mathematics, Chromatography, Liquid
Proteomics, 1303 Biochemistry, Proteins, 142-005 142-005, Applications Notes, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, 1312 Molecular Biology, 1706 Computer Science Applications, 2613 Statistics and Probability, 2605 Computational Mathematics, Algorithms, Software, 1703 Computational Theory and Mathematics, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 57 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
