
doi: 10.3390/bdcc7020084
Homomorphic encryption (HE) is a promising solution for handling sensitive data in semi-trusted third-party computing environments, as it enables processing of encrypted data. However, applying sophisticated techniques such as machine learning, statistics, and image processing to encrypted data remains a challenge. The computational complexity of some encrypted operations can significantly increase processing time. In this paper, we focus on the analysis of two state-of-the-art HE matrix multiplication algorithms with the best time and space complexities. We show how their performance depends on the libraries and the execution context, considering the standard Cheon–Kim–Kim–Song (CKKS) HE scheme with fixed-point numbers based on the Microsoft SEAL and PALISADE libraries. We show that Windows OS for the SEAL library and Linux OS for the PALISADE library are the best options. In general, PALISADE-Linux outperforms PALISADE-Windows, SEAL-Linux, and SEAL-Windows by 1.28, 1.59, and 1.67 times on average for different matrix sizes, respectively. We derive high-precision extrapolation formulas to estimate the processing time of HE multiplication of larger matrices.
Technology, T, matrix multiplication, homomorphic encryption, CKKS; homomorphic encryption; homomorphic encryption standard; matrix multiplication; PALISADE; SEAL, CKKS, homomorphic encryption standard, PALISADE, SEAL
Technology, T, matrix multiplication, homomorphic encryption, CKKS; homomorphic encryption; homomorphic encryption standard; matrix multiplication; PALISADE; SEAL, CKKS, homomorphic encryption standard, PALISADE, SEAL
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
