Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cemented and Uncemented MG-II Knee Replacements

Authors: Kim C. Bertin; Scott C. Frischknecht;

Prospective Randomized Comparison of Cemented and Uncemented MG-II Knee Replacements

Abstract

A prospective randomized study of patients between the ages of 65 and 85 with a diagnosis of degenerative arthritis was performed to evaluate the performance of the MG-II total knee arthroplasty in a cemented and a cementless application. All surgical procedures were performed by a single surgeon. The patients were randomly assigned with no consideration given to bone quality, accuracy of surgical cuts, or activity level. The cemented group of patients had an MG-II arthroplasty implanted with a cemented patellar and tibial components with a cementless femoral component. The cementless group had a totally cementless MG-II arthroplasty using a metalbacked patellar component, a cementless tibial component fixed with four screws, and a cementless femoral component. All patients were followed prospectively with clinical and radiographic data obtained at each follow-up interval. Average follow-up was 2 years. Evaluation of clinical symptoms and radiographs would indicate that cementless MG-II total knee arthroplasty is as effective as cemented hybrid MG-II total knee arthroplasty. Hybrid cemented knees recovered faster than cementless knees.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?