
pmid: 34856285
Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a non-destructive, high-resolution imaging technique that is currently under significant development for analyzing geological areas with remote devices or natural samples in a laboratory. In both cases, the hyperspectral image provides several sedimentary structures that must be separated to temporally and spatially describe the sample. Sediment sequences are composed of successive deposits (strata, homogenite, flood) that are visible depending on sample properties. The classical methods to identify them are time-consuming, have a low spatial resolution (millimeters) and are generally based on naked-eye counting. In this study, we compare several supervised classification algorithms to discriminate sedimentological structures in lake sediments. Instantaneous events in lake sediments are generally linked to extreme geodynamical events (e.g., floods, earthquakes), so their identification and counting are essential to understand long-term fluctuations and improve hazard assessments. Identification and counting are done by reconstructing a chronicle of event layer occurrence, including estimation of deposit thicknesses. Here, we applied two hyperspectral imaging sensors (Visible Near-Infrared, VNIR, 60 μm, 400-1000 nm; Short Wave Infrared, SWIR, 200 μm, 1000-2500 nm) on three sediment cores from different lake systems. We highlight that the SWIR sensor is the optimal one for creating robust classification models with discriminant analyses (prediction accuracies of 0.87-0.98). Indeed, the VNIR sensor is impacted by the surface reliefs and structures that are not in the learning set, which causes mis-classification. These observations are also valid for the combined sensor (VNIR-SWIR) and the RGB images. Several spatial and spectral pre-processing were also compared and enabled one to highlight discriminant information specific to a sample and a sensor. These works show that the combined use of hyperspectral imaging and machine learning improves the characterization of sedimentary structures compared to conventional methods.
Geologic Sediments, 550, Hyperspectral imaging, [INFO.INFO-TS] Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, Computers, [SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes, Hyperspectral Imaging, Discrimination methods, Visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, [STAT.ML] Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], Machine Learning, [SDE.MCG] Environmental Sciences/Global Changes, Lakes, [INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, [STAT.ML]Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], Machine learning, Automatic detection, Algorithms, Sedimentary deposits
Geologic Sediments, 550, Hyperspectral imaging, [INFO.INFO-TS] Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, Computers, [SDE.MCG]Environmental Sciences/Global Changes, Hyperspectral Imaging, Discrimination methods, Visible and near-infrared spectroscopy, [STAT.ML] Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], Machine Learning, [SDE.MCG] Environmental Sciences/Global Changes, Lakes, [INFO.INFO-TS]Computer Science [cs]/Signal and Image Processing, [STAT.ML]Statistics [stat]/Machine Learning [stat.ML], Machine learning, Automatic detection, Algorithms, Sedimentary deposits
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
