
In this study, nine non linear growth curve models were used to determine the goodness of fit by the body weight measurements of the total number of 178 partridges(Alectoris chukar), 93 females, and 85 males, respectively. The R2(coefficients of determination) values for the total partridges, females and males in Brody, Gompertz, Logistic, von Bertalanffy, asymptote regression,exponential, Monomolecular, Richards and Weibull-type were 0.985, 0.980 and 0.984, 0.997, 0.998 and 0.998, 0.996, 0.999 and 0.999, 0.995, 0.995 and 0.996, 0.985, 0.980 and 0.984, 0.891, 0.871 and 0.892, 0.985, 0.980 and 0.984, 0.997, 0.999 and 0.999, 0.997, 0.999 and 0.999, respectively. The R2 values for Gompertz, Logistic, von Bertalanffy, Richards and Weibull-type were >0.99, while the exponential (<0.90) had the lowest. What’s more, the Gompertz, Logistic, Richards and Weibull-type models best described the data because of lower MSE (mean square error), AIC(Akaike’s information criteria) and BIC(Schwarz Bayesian information criterion), higher adj. R2(Adjusted coefficient of determination) and r(the correlation coefficient between measured body weight and estimated body weight) and there was not an autocorrelation between the residual values. As a result, based on goodness of fit criteria; R2, adj.R2, MSE, r, AIC, BIC values, the Weibull-type model best described live weight data of the Partridges(Alectoris chukar).
non linear model, Veterinary medicine, SF600-1100, partridges, live weight, growth curve
non linear model, Veterinary medicine, SF600-1100, partridges, live weight, growth curve
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
