
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.30462
pmid: 17192957
AbstractThis study investigated the possible association of the MAOA T941G gene variant with differential antidepressant response to mirtazapine and/or paroxetine in 102 patients with major depression (DSM‐IV criteria) participating in a randomized double‐blind controlled clinical trial. Female mirtazapine‐treated patients homozygous for the T‐allele had a significantly faster and better treatment response than TG/GG‐patients. In males, we failed to show an association between MAOA T941G gene variant and mirtazapine response. In the paroxetine‐treated group, there were no significant differences in treatment response between MAOA T941G genotype groups. Time course of response and antidepressant efficacy of mirtazapine, but not paroxetine, seem to be influenced in a clinically relevant manner by this allelic variation within the MAOA gene, at least in female patients. An independent replication of our finding is needed. If replicated, genotyping of this locus could become a promising tool to predict response to mirtazapine treatment in females suffering from major depression. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Male, Depressive Disorder, Major, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Genotype, Genetic Linkage, Mirtazapine, Mianserin, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Antidepressive Agents, Paroxetine, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Gene Frequency, Humans, Female, Monoamine Oxidase
Adult, Male, Depressive Disorder, Major, Sex Characteristics, Time Factors, Genotype, Genetic Linkage, Mirtazapine, Mianserin, Middle Aged, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Antidepressive Agents, Paroxetine, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Gene Frequency, Humans, Female, Monoamine Oxidase
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 59 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
