
This research analyzes the current archive of inferior solutions used in Success-History based Adaptive Differential Evolution (SHADE) and tests its influence on the result of optimization. A novel Enhanced Archive (EA) is analyzed in the same way and the results are compared. In order to compare both methods on different types of test functions, CEC2015 benchmark set was used as the test bed. Results suggest that there is a possibility for further research because current existing archive implementations do not provide sufficient benefits to the optimization algorithm.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
