
doi: 10.1109/18.746779
Summary: We analyze a mobile wireless link comprising \(M\) transmitter and \(N\) receiver antennas operating in a Rayleigh flatfading environment. The propagation coefficients between pairs of transmitter and receiver antennas are statistically independent and unknown; they remain constant for a coherence interval of \(T\) symbol periods, after which they change to new independent values which they maintain for another \(T\) symbol periods, and so on. Computing the link capacity, associated with channel coding over multiple fading intervals, requires an optimization over the joint density of \(T \cdot M\) complex transmitted signals. We prove that there is no point in making the number of transmitter antennas greater than the length of the coherence interval: the capacity for \(M>T\) is equal to the capacity for \(M=T\). Capacity is achieved when the \(T\times M\) transmitted signal matrix is equal to the product of two statistically independent matrices: a \(T\times T\) isotropically distributed unitary matrix times a certain \(T\times M\) random matrix that is diagonal, real, and nonnegative. This result enables us to determine capacity for many interesting cases. We conclude that, for a fixed number of antennas, as the length of the coherence interval increases, the capacity approaches the capacity obtained as if the receiver knew the propagation coefficients.
space-time modulation, wireless communications, Communication theory, Antennas, waveguides in optics and electromagnetic theory, Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory, multielement antenna arrays
space-time modulation, wireless communications, Communication theory, Antennas, waveguides in optics and electromagnetic theory, Channel models (including quantum) in information and communication theory, multielement antenna arrays
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 980 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% |
