Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Front-to-Rear Crashes Involving Two Vehicles With Severe Driver Injury

Authors: David C, Viano; Chantal S, Parenteau;

Front-to-Rear Crashes Involving Two Vehicles With Severe Driver Injury

Abstract

This study investigates the risk for severe-to-fatal injury (Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale [MAIS] 4+F) to drivers in two-vehicle crashes involving front impacts into the rear of another vehicle.1995-2009 National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) was analyzed for driver injuries in front-to-rear crashes without rear occupants in either vehicle. The study involved 13+-year-old front outboard occupants in model year (MY) 1995+ light vehicles. Injury severity was subdivided into MAIS 0+6 and MAIS 4+F to assess the risk of severe-to-fatal injury (MAIS 4+F/MAIS 0+6). Injury risks were determined using weighted data for the drivers by impact type. Standard errors were calculated in SAS to determine ±95 percent confidence intervals. An in-depth analysis was made of individual cases with severely injured drivers in the front and rear impacts.There were 215,163 drivers in the 15 years of NASS-CDS with known injuries in front-to-rear two-vehicle collisions; 624 were severely injured (MAIS 4+F) in the rear impacts and 124 in the front impacts. The risk for severe-to-fatal driver injury was 0.290 ± 0.241 percent in rear impacts and 0.058 ± 0.057 percent in front impacts. The difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). There were 13 unweighted cases with MAIS 4+F driver injury in rear impacts. Most (77%) involved intrusion in the vicinity of the driver's seating area with the seat supported upright or deformed forward. There were 5 unweighted cases with severely injured drivers in frontal impacts. Three (60%) involved intrusion due to offset frontal loading. There was only one crash where both drivers were severely injured.In front-to-rear crashes with two vehicles, typically one driver was severely injured, not both. The risk of severe injury was not significantly different for drivers in the front or rear impacts. The risk was higher in rear impacts due to intrusion into the driver's seating area that supported or pushed the driver's seat forward. The risk for drivers in frontal crashes was also often related to intrusion due to offset loading and occupant compartment deformation.

Keywords

Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Accidents, Traffic, Middle Aged, Risk Assessment, United States, Young Adult, Abbreviated Injury Scale, Photography, Humans, Wounds and Injuries, Female, Prospective Studies, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!