
ObjectiveTo update evidence‐based recommendations for the treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and nonradiographic axial spondyloarthritis (SpA).MethodsWe conducted updated systematic literature reviews for 20 clinical questions on pharmacologic treatment addressed in the 2015 guidelines, and for 26 new questions on pharmacologic treatment, treat‐to‐target strategy, and use of imaging. New questions addressed the use of secukinumab, ixekizumab, tofacitinib, tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) biosimilars, and biologic tapering/discontinuation, among others. We used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology to assess the quality of evidence and formulate recommendations and required at least 70% agreement among the voting panel.ResultsRecommendations for AS and nonradiographic axial SpA are similar. TNFi are recommended over secukinumab or ixekizumab as the first biologic to be used. Secukinumab or ixekizumab is recommended over the use of a second TNFi in patients with primary nonresponse to the first TNFi. TNFi, secukinumab, and ixekizumab are favored over tofacitinib. Co‐administration of low‐dose methotrexate with TNFi is not recommended, nor is a strict treat‐to‐target strategy or discontinuation or tapering of biologics in patients with stable disease. Sulfasalazine is recommended only for persistent peripheral arthritis when TNFi are contraindicated. For patients with unclear disease activity, spine or pelvis magnetic resonance imaging could aid assessment. Routine monitoring of radiographic changes with serial spine radiographs is not recommended.ConclusionThese recommendations provide updated guidance regarding use of new medications and imaging of the axial skeleton in the management of AS and nonradiographic axial SpA.
Ankylosing, Biomedical Research, Clinical Sciences, Immunology, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Clinical sciences, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Autoimmune Disease, Antibodies, Rare Diseases, Deprescriptions, Rheumatology, Piperidines, Clinical Research, Medical, Monoclonal, Spondylarthritis, Psychology, Humans, Pyrroles, Spondylitis, Ankylosing, Humanized, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Societies, Medical, Clinical Trials as Topic, Biological Products, Allied health and rehabilitation science, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Arthritis, Inflammatory and immune system, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, United States, Arthritis & Rheumatology, Radiography, Good Health and Well Being, Treatment Outcome, Pyrimidines, 6.1 Pharmaceuticals, Antirheumatic Agents, Public Health and Health Services, Spondylarthropathies, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, Non-Steroidal, Societies, Spondylitis
Ankylosing, Biomedical Research, Clinical Sciences, Immunology, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Clinical sciences, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Autoimmune Disease, Antibodies, Rare Diseases, Deprescriptions, Rheumatology, Piperidines, Clinical Research, Medical, Monoclonal, Spondylarthritis, Psychology, Humans, Pyrroles, Spondylitis, Ankylosing, Humanized, Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, Societies, Medical, Clinical Trials as Topic, Biological Products, Allied health and rehabilitation science, Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Arthritis, Inflammatory and immune system, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Evaluation of treatments and therapeutic interventions, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, United States, Arthritis & Rheumatology, Radiography, Good Health and Well Being, Treatment Outcome, Pyrimidines, 6.1 Pharmaceuticals, Antirheumatic Agents, Public Health and Health Services, Spondylarthropathies, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, Non-Steroidal, Societies, Spondylitis
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 763 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% |
