Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Experimental Geronto...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Experimental Gerontology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

The emergence of age-related deterioration in dynamic, but not quiet standing balance abilities among healthy middle-aged adults

Authors: Mathew William, Hill; Michael Joseph, Duncan; Michael James, Price;

The emergence of age-related deterioration in dynamic, but not quiet standing balance abilities among healthy middle-aged adults

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to quantify differences in lower extremity reach performance, static posturography and gait outcomes between young (20-39 years), middle-aged (40-59 years) and older (60-79 years) adults using identical tests and parameters. This was a cross-sectional study with three parallel groups (young [20-39 years] vs. intermediate [40-59 years] vs. older [60-79 years] adults). In a randomised order each participant completed: (i) static posturography, (ii) lower extremity reach performance, and (iii) gait assessment. Changes in balance between age groups were analysed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). Additionally, correlational analysis was used to identify relationships between age and outcome measures. Centre of pressure (COP) movement was greater in older compared to intermediate-aged (d = 0.50-2.40) and young (d = 0.54-2.61) adults (p < 0.001). Reduced lower extremity reach distance was found in older compared to intermediate-aged (d = 1.28-3.60) and young (d = 2.09-3.87) adults (p < 0.001), while young adults demonstrated greater reach distances than intermediate (d = 0.64-1.74) aged adults (p < 0.001). Correlational analysis revealed moderate to strong positive correlations between age across the adult life span (20-79 years) for all COP metrics and lower extremity reach outcomes. When correlational analyses were performed only in the young and middle-aged groups (20-59 years), coefficients were weak and not significant for the COP, but remained moderate for lower extremity reach performance. Lower extremity reach performance reveals earlier age-related declines in postural stability that are not evident during quiet standing tasks of varying difficulty. These findings should contribute to the early identification of potential balance deficits in those where balance problems do not yet exist, which will assist clinical decision making with respect to timely implementation of fall prevention strategies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cross-Sectional Studies, Movement, Humans, Accidental Falls, Middle Aged, Gait, Postural Balance, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
gold