
pmid: 18318008
AbstractThe mixture of phosphopeptides enriched from proteome samples are very complex. To reduce the complexity it is necessary to fractionate the phosphopeptides. However, conventional enrichment methods typically only enrich phosphopeptides but not fractionate phosphopeptides. In this study, the application of strong anion exchange (SAX) chromatography for enrichment and fractionation of phosphopeptides was presented. It was found that phosphopeptides were highly enriched by SAX and majority of unmodified peptides did not bind onto SAX. Compared with Fe3+ immobilized metal affinity chromatography (Fe3+‐IMAC), almost double phosphopeptides were identified from the same sample when only one fraction was generated by SAX. SAX and Fe3+‐IMAC showed the complementarity in enrichment and identification of phosphopeptides. It was also demonstrated that SAX have the ability to fractionate phosphopeptides under gradient elution based on their different interaction with SAX adsorbent. SAX was further applied to enrich and fractionate phosphopeptides in tryptic digest of proteins extracted from human liver tissue adjacent to tumorous region for phosphoproteome profiling. This resulted in the highly confident identification of 274 phosphorylation sites from 305 unique phosphopeptides corresponding to 168 proteins at false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.96%.
Phosphopeptides, Liver, Proteome, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Amino Acid Sequence, Chemical Fractionation, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Chromatography, Liquid
Phosphopeptides, Liver, Proteome, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Amino Acid Sequence, Chemical Fractionation, Chromatography, Ion Exchange, Chromatography, Liquid
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 181 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
