
ABSTRACT The digital age has transformed how brands communicate and interact with their customers. One consequence is that the effect of negative word of mouth on a brand’s reputation has intensified. This study investigates various response strategies employed to protect organizations’ reputations in the online environment. Accordingly, it collected data through two methods. First, 10 semi-structured interviews were conducted with brand managers to identify the strategies that they used to minimize negative word of mouth in social media. Second, the social media interventions of different brands under management by agencies were collected to complement the interviews, and determine whether any additional strategies could be identified. The results showed that, when negative word of mouth events occurred, companies preferred to either apologize, hide the original message, respond in private rather than in public, or simply ignore the negative comments from customers.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
