Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Japanese Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus non-Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) for bullous keratopathy

Authors: Risa, Yamazaki; Ryohei, Nejima; Yoshiyuki, Ichihashi; Kazunori, Miyata; Kazuo, Tsubota; Shigeto, Shimmura;

Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus non-Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) for bullous keratopathy

Abstract

To investigate the long-term results of Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) versus non-Descemet stripping and automated endothelial keratoplasty (nDSAEK) for non-Fuchs bullous keratopathy.Retrospective comparative study.Twenty-nine eyes of 28 patients who underwent DSAEK and 60 eyes of 56 patients who underwent nDSAEK for bullous keratopathy were retrospectively analyzed in a clinical case-control study. All the operations were done using precut donor buttons prepared by overseas eye banks. The recipient Descemet membrane was stripped in DSAEK, whilst it was left intact in nDSAEK. Donor buttons were inserted through a 4.2-mm corneal incision using the pull-through technique. Air was injected into the anterior chamber at the end of the operation. We investigated the visual acuity, refraction, endothelial cell density, and complications.The average best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was significantly improved at all time points measured after surgery in both the DSAEK and the nDSAEK groups, and no significant differences were found between the 2 groups after surgery. No significant differences in spherical equivalent were found between the groups before and after surgery. The endothelial cell density gradually decreased after the operation in both groups; however, no significant difference between the 2 groups was found at any of the time points measured.DSAEK and nDSAEK provided excellent refractive and reasonable visual outcomes in our long-term observation.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Case-Control Studies, Endothelium, Corneal, Graft Survival, Humans, Refraction, Ocular, Descemet Membrane, Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty, Corneal Diseases, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Top 10%
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!