Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Vitellogenesis and Viviparity

Authors: Ian P. Callard; S.-m. Ho;

Vitellogenesis and Viviparity

Abstract

In vertebrates, there are three principal modes of nutrition for developing embryos: (1) the laying down of food stores, synthesized in the liver, in the oocyte (vitellogenesis) (this is the most common mode in nonmammalian species); (2) the direct provision of nutrients to the developing young through the intermediary of the uterine wall by either secretory activity (histotroph) or (3) a direct maternal connection (placentation) (Table I). In egg-laying vertebrates, yolk is the only source of fetal nutrition; however, in live-bearing (viviparous) species, at least two of these mechanisms may exist in an individual. Thus, aplacental rays and torpedos have eggs with a very small amount of endogenous yolk, sufficient only for early development. The bulk of the nutrients are supplied as ‘‘histotroph”* by specialized secretory elements of the reproductive tract. In ‘‘placental” elasmobranchs (some sharks), yolk is present and may be reduced in amount, but the yolk-sac placenta forms a site for exchange of nutrients from the mother to the fetus. This is also true of placental reptiles (certain small lizards and snakes). However, in reptiles both a yolk-sac placenta (choriovitelline or omphaloplacenta) and the phylogenetically newer chorioallantoic placenta exist and function sequentially depending on the quantity of endogenous yolk supplied with the egg. In eutherian mammals, no true yolk is present in the eggs, the developing young being dependent on histotroph from the secretory epithelium for variable times depending on the species (Table II).

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    14
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
14
Average
Top 10%
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!