<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
pmid: 8450442
Intrastromal Corneal Rings (ICRs) have been demonstrated to flatten human corneas when implanted into peripheral intrastromal corneal channels. To study the flattening effect, ICRs of increasing thickness, 0.26, 0.31, 0.36, 0.41, and 0.46 mm, were placed into oversized (approximately 70% depth) intrastromal channels in 38 eye-bank eyes. Each of 33 eyes received one ICR; the mean change in dioptric data was obtained for four meridians using an intraoperative photokeratoscope. Intrastromal corneal rings of increasing thickness resulted in corneal flattening of 3.8 +/- 1.1, 4.9 +/- 0.6, 5.2 +/- 1.1, 5.3 +/- 1.9, and 7.3 +/- 1.6 diopters, respectively, for keratoscope mire 2. One of each size ICR was placed into one of five additional eye-bank eyes; the degree of flattening measured by laser holographic interferometry was 1.8, 2.9, 5.5, 4.7, and 10.1 diopters, respectively, for the central 6 mm corneal zone. These results indicate that the ICR provides a fairly linear flattening relationship over the range of thicknesses tested. Additionally, laser holographic interferometry wave unit maps of preoperative and postoperative corneas demonstrated that the ICR tends to preserve positive corneal asphericity if present preoperatively.
Cornea, Anthropometry, Corneal Stroma, Holography, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Methylmethacrylates, Prostheses and Implants, Eye Banks
Cornea, Anthropometry, Corneal Stroma, Holography, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Methylmethacrylates, Prostheses and Implants, Eye Banks
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 120 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |