Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Journal of Obstetric...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Intrapartum risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy leading to cerebral palsy in women without apparent sentinel events

Authors: Yamada, Takahiro; Cho, Kazutoshi; Morikawa, Mamoru; Yamada, Takashi; Minakami, Hisanori;

Intrapartum risk factors for neonatal encephalopathy leading to cerebral palsy in women without apparent sentinel events

Abstract

AbstractAimTo determine intrapartum factors associated with neonatal encephalopathy leading to cerebral palsy (NE‐CP).MethodsA total of 70 NE‐CP patients who fulfilled study criteria (cephalic singleton pregnancy with attempted vaginal delivery [AVD] at gestational week [GW] ≥36; intrapartum occurrence of non‐reassuring fetal status without apparent cause following reassuring fetal status on admission; and development of NE‐CP) were compared with 210 AVD controls who had 1‐ and 5‐min Apgar score ≥8 matched for GW, maternal parity, and use of uterotonics. Suboptimal care was defined as delayed reaction due to misinterpretation of fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing, or inappropriate trial of instrumental delivery (TOID). Successful and failed TOID were defined as vaginal and cesarean delivery after TOID, respectively. The 210 controls were assumed not to have had suboptimal care.ResultsThe rates of successful (34% vs 12%) and failed TOID (11% vs 0.0%), cesarean section (34% vs 14%), suboptimal care (57% vs 0.0%), pregnancy‐induced hypertension (11% vs 2.4%), birthweight ≥3800 g (8.6% vs 1.9%), subgaleal hemorrhage (16% vs 0.0%) were significantly higher in NE‐CP patients than in controls. Selection with the stepwise method and logistic regression analysis identified four independent risk factors for NE‐CP: suboptimal intrapartum care (OR, 2.21; 95%CI: 1.99–2.47), cesarean section (OR, 1.19; 95%CI: 1.08–1.31), successful TOID (OR, 1.14; 95%CI: 1.03–1.25), and hypertension (OR, 1.20; 95%CI: 1.01–1.42).ConclusionsTraining programs for improved interpretation of FHR tracing and appropriate TOID are required to prevent NE‐CP among healthy and mature fetuses in Japan.

Keywords

Cerebral Palsy, instrumental delivery, 490, Infant, Newborn, non-reassuring fetal status, fetal heart rate tracing, vacuum delivery, Japan, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Case-Control Studies, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Humans, Female, macrosomia, shoulder dystocia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
bronze