Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Bloodarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
Blood
Article
Data sources: UnpayWall
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
DI-fusion
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: DI-fusion
Blood
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

PET-Guided Strategy Improves the Safety of Beacopp-Based Treatment in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: Prolonged Follow-up of the Lysa Ahl 2011 Phase 3 Study

Authors: Casasnovas, Olivier; Racapé, Judith; Dechene, Julie; Bouabdallah, Reda; Brice, Pauline; Lazarovici, Julien; Ghesquieres, Hervé; +15 Authors

PET-Guided Strategy Improves the Safety of Beacopp-Based Treatment in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: Prolonged Follow-up of the Lysa Ahl 2011 Phase 3 Study

Abstract

Background AHL2011 study (NCT01358747) demonstrated that PET negativity after 2 cycles of upfront BEACOPPescalated (BEA) allows to switch to 4 cycles of ABVD 84% of patients (pts) with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) leading to reduce immediate treatment toxicity without loss of tumor control (Casasnovas RO, Lancet Oncol 2019). We report an updated follow-up of the study with a focus on the late treatment-related adverse events including secondary primary malignancies (SPM) and unfertility. Methods In AHL2011 823 patients aged 18-60 with a newly diagnosed advanced HL defined by an Ann Arbor stage III, IV or IIB with M/T>0.33 or extranodal involvement were prospectively randomized between a standard arm (n=413) delivering 6 x BEA and a PET-driven arm (n=410) after 2 x BEA delivering 4 x ABVD in PET2- pts and 4 x BEA in PET2+ pts. In both arms PET performed after 4 cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. We aimed at excluding inferiority of the PET-driven arm of at least 10% compared to the standard arm which was achieved with the analysis on 10/2017. The data cutoff for the present analysis was 29 April 2019. A prospective fertility substudy for patients <45y at time of randomization was performed analyzing: - In females, ovarian function using serum levels of FSH, estradiol and centralized anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) measurements. Acute premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) was defined as FSH > 24 IU/L twice during 5y follow-up when available, with estradiol < 50pg/ml, and low ovarian reserve (OR) by AMH < 0.16ng/ml. - In males, FSH serum levels and sperm analysis. Results With a 5.6 year median follow-up, 5y PFS and OS were similar in both randomization arms (PFS: 87.5% vs 86.7% ; HR 1.07, 95%CI 0.74-1.57; p=0.67; OS: 97.7% in both arms; HR=1.012, 95%CI 0.50-2.10; p=0.53). In the whole cohort full interim PET assessment predicted patients PFS (5y PFS = 92.3% in PET2-/PET4-, 75.4% [HR= 3.26 ; 95%CI 18.3-5.77] in PET2+/PET4- and 46.5% [HR= 12.4 ; 95%CI : 7.31-19.51] in PET4+ pts respectively; p <0.0001; figure 1) independently of IPS. OS was also impacted by interim PET results and PET2+/PET4- patients (5y OS : 93.5% ; HR=3.3, 95%CI : 1.07-10.1; p=0.036) and PET4+ patients (5y OS 91.9%; HR=3.756, 95%CI 1.07-13.18, p=0.038) had a significant lower OS than PET2-/PET4- patients (98.2%). 22 patients (2.7%) developped a secondary primary (SPM), 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms respectively. 424 males and 145 females with a median age 27y (16 - 45) entered the fertility sub-study. Baseline ovarian functions based on FSH and AMH levels were similar in the 70 and 75 female of the standard and PET-driven arms. During follow-up, 32 pts experienced POI (46.1% versus 14.5% in the standard and PET-driven arms, respectively). The risk of POI was significantly associated with both age, total dose of alkylating agents, and was reduced in the PET-driven arm (HR=0.20, 95%CI 0.08-0.5; p<0.001). The risk of low OR was related to cumulative dose of etoposide >5g (HR=0.36, 95%CI 0.14-0.96; p=0.04) but not to arms. In males, median baseline FSH levels were similar in both arms but 19 and 23% experienced severe oligospermia at baseline in standard (n=214) and PET-driven arms (n=210), respectively. Chemotherapy dramatically reduced sperm numeration in both arms but recovery occured more frequently in the PET-driven arm (severe oligospermia at 4-5 year: 50% vs 93%). A total of 84 patients (14.7%) reported pregnancies including 49 (17.2%) in the PET driven arm vs 35 (12.3%) in the standard arm (p=0.12) and required assisted reproductive technology treatment more frequently in the standard arm (23% vs 14%). Conclusions The prolonged follow-up confirms that the PET-driven strategy delivering 4 cycles of ABVD in PET negative patients after 2 cycles of BEA is non inferior compared to standard 6 cycles of BEA. PET4 provides additionnal prognostic information to PET2 and identifies patients with particularly poor prognosis. The PET-driven treatment allows to reduce significantly the risk of infertility in both men (recovery of oligospermia) and women (decreasing by 5 the risk of POI) and improves the chances of spontaneous pregnancy after completion of HL treatment. With the current follow-up the risk of SPM was low (2.7%) and similar in both arms. Disclosures Casasnovas: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MSD: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria; AMGEN: Consultancy, Honoraria; abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria. Brice:Takeda: Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; BMS: Honoraria; MSD: Honoraria; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Ghesquieres:Gilead: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; CELGENE: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Roche: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES; Janssen: Honoraria. Stamatoulas Bastard:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Honoraria; Pfizer: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES. Dupuis:Henri Mondor University Hospital Creteil France: Current Employment. Gac:Roche: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Bouabdallah:Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Honoraria. Morschhauser:Genentech, Inc.: Consultancy; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Servier: Consultancy; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Epizyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; F. Hoffmann-La Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. André:Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celgene: Other, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers-Squibb: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); CHU UCL Namur, site Godinne, Yvoir, Belgium: Current Employment; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Consultancy, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company); Karyopharm: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy; Amgen: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding; Roche: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company), Research Funding. Meignan:ROCHE: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES (paid by any for-profit health care company). Demeestere:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria; THERAMEX FERRING: Other: TRAVEL, ACCOMMODATIONS, EXPENSES.

Country
Belgium
Keywords

Cancérologie, Gynécologie, Sciences biomédicales

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Top 10%
Average
Average
Green
bronze