<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
A comparative analysis of the genomes of Drosophila melanogaster , Caenorhabditis elegans , and Saccharomyces cerevisiae —and the proteins they are predicted to encode—was undertaken in the context of cellular, developmental, and evolutionary processes. The nonredundant protein sets of flies and worms are similar in size and are only twice that of yeast, but different gene families are expanded in each genome, and the multidomain proteins and signaling pathways of the fly and worm are far more complex than those of yeast. The fly has orthologs to 177 of the 289 human disease genes examined and provides the foundation for rapid analysis of some of the basic processes involved in human disease.
570, Genome, Proteome, Genetics, Medical, Cell Cycle, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Immunity, Apoptosis, Helminth Proteins, Biological Evolution, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Fungal Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Genes, Duplicate, Multigene Family, Neoplasms, Cell Adhesion, Animals, Humans, Insect Proteins, Caenorhabditis elegans
570, Genome, Proteome, Genetics, Medical, Cell Cycle, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Immunity, Apoptosis, Helminth Proteins, Biological Evolution, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Fungal Proteins, Drosophila melanogaster, Genes, Duplicate, Multigene Family, Neoplasms, Cell Adhesion, Animals, Humans, Insect Proteins, Caenorhabditis elegans
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2K | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.01% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% |