<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 11365/29443
The problem of optimum watermark embedding and detection was addressed in a recent paper by Merhav and Sabbag, where the optimality criterion was the maximum false-negative error exponent subject to a guaranteed false-positive error exponent. In particular, Merhav and Sabbag derived universal asymptotically optimum embedding and detection rules under the assumption that the detector relies solely on second-order joint empirical statistics of the received signal and the watermark. In the case of a Gaussian host signal and a Gaussian attack, however, closed-form expressions for the optimum embedding strategy and the false-negative error exponent were not obtained in that work. In this paper, we derive the false-negative error exponent for any given embedding strategy and use such a result to show that in general the optimum embedding rule depends on the variance of the host sequence and the variance of the attack noise. We then focus on high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) regime, deriving the optimum embedding strategy for such a setup. In this case, a universally optimum embedding rule turns out to exist and to be very simple with an intuitively appealing geometrical interpretation. The effectiveness of the newly proposed embedding strategy is evaluated numerically.
Hypothesis testing; Neyman-Pearson; Watermark detection; Watermark embedding; Watermarking
Hypothesis testing; Neyman-Pearson; Watermark detection; Watermark embedding; Watermarking
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |