Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Shade and Statue: A Comparative Analysis of Fedor Sologub and Innokentii Annenskii

Authors: Tomas Venclova;

Shade and Statue: A Comparative Analysis of Fedor Sologub and Innokentii Annenskii

Abstract

/AJlthough a well-known Russian critic once observed that there is a "certain consonance" between Sologub and Annenskii, systematic research needs to be done before we can know the extent to which this observation is true. As a general subject of inquiry, "Sologub and Annenskii" can be divided into at least three distinct but closely related subtopics: the biographical relationship between the two poets and their assessment of each other; the mutual quotations, subtexts, and so on, that appear in their work; and the comparison of their artistic systems, which then allows for a more precise definition of each poet.2 This paper will compare the poetic systems of Sologub and Annenskii, a task made easier by the fact that both of them wrote dramas based on the same ancient myth: Annenskii's lyrical tragedy Laodamiia (Laodameia), written in 1902 and printed in 1906, and Sologub's Dar mudrykh pchel (The Gift of the Wise Bees), which was printed in 1907. It also will take up a broader theoretical issue extending beyond the comparison of Sologub and Annenskii: the interrelation between the personal and the cultural myth. In a work that inaugurated a new line of scholarly inquiry, Roman Jakobson took up the task of identifying and describing the personal myth that lies at the foundation of Pushkin's creativity and ultimately determined his poetics.3 Some have

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!