Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ OSF Preprintsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.i...
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY
Data sources: Crossref
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
PsyArXiv
Preprint . 2018
Data sources: PsyArXiv
Open Science Framework
Preprint . 2018
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 6 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory

Authors: Daniela Palombo; Signy Sheldon; Brian Levine;

Individual Differences in Autobiographical Memory

Abstract

Although humans have a remarkable capacity to recall a wealth of detail from the past, there are marked inter-individual differences in the quantity and quality of our mnemonic experiences. Such differences in autobiographical memory may appear self-evident, yet there has been little research on this topic. In this review, we synthesize an emerging body of research regarding individual differences in autobiographical memory. We focus on two syndromes that fall at the extreme of the ‘remembering’ dimension, Highly Superior Autobiographical Memory (HSAM) and Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory (SDAM). We also discuss findings from research on less extreme individual differences in autobiographical memory. This avenue of research is pivotal for a full description of the behavioral and neural substrates of autobiographical memory.

Keywords

PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Motion Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Problem Solving, Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vision, Memory, Episodic, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Consciousness, Biological Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Touch, Taste, and Smell, Individuality, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognition and Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Embodied Cognition, Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Life Sciences|Neuroscience and Neurobiology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Creativity, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Reasoning, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Judgment and Decision Making, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Audition, Humans, Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Biases, Framing, and Heuristics, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Perceptual Organization, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Attention, Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Memory, Brain, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Concepts and Categories, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Imagery, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Language, FOS: Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Neuroscience, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Multisensory Integration, Perception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Picture Processing, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Vestibular Systems and Proprioception, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Cognitive Psychology|Learning, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Perception|Action, Neuroscience

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    114
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 1%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
114
Top 1%
Top 10%
Top 1%
hybrid