Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Weararrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Wear
Article . 1996 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Micromechanical and tribological characterization of alternate pole tip materials for magnetic recording heads

Authors: Steven T. Patton; Bharat Bhushan;

Micromechanical and tribological characterization of alternate pole tip materials for magnetic recording heads

Abstract

Pole tip recession or PTR (relative wear of the pole tip with respect to the air bearing surface) causes signal loss when using inductive heads. Loss of signal caused by spacing between a head gap and the recording medium is magnified in high-density short wavelength recording. Nickel iron (NiFe) is the most commonly used pole material. NiFe is softer than the head substrate material (typically NiZn ferrite or Al2O3TiC) which leads to PTR as a result of differential wear of the materials. Alternate pole tip materials which are more wear resistant and superior in magnetic properties (such as high saturation magnetization), as compared with NiFe, need to be developed. In this research, NiFe, cobalt zirconium tantalum (CoZrTa) and iron aluminum nitride (FeAlN) materials were studied. In the first phase of this study, micromechanical characterization of the three pole tip materials, the alumina (Al2O3) insulating under/overcoat and gap material and the Al2O3TiC substrate was conducted using a depth-sensing nanoindenter. The nanohardness of NiFe, CoZrTa and Al2O3 are similar and about one half that of FeAlN, and the hardness of the Al2O3TiC substrate is about twice that of FeAlN. Microscratch studies showed that the critical load required to cause failure of the NiFe and CoZrTa films are similar and about one fourth that of FeAlN, and the critical load for FeAlN is comparable with that of the Al2O3 and Al2O3TiC substrate. Thus, FeAlN is superior in mechanical properties to NiFe and CoZrTa. In the second phase of this study, dummy tape heads fabricated with the three pole materials were run against metal particle (MP) tape in a linear tape drive. The PTR was measured by atomic force microscope (AFM) imaging before and after the sliding tests. Any nonuniformities in the thin-film region gets removed in the first few kilometres of sliding. FeAlN poles exhibited a low (∼10 nm) and constant PTR over 1 000 km of tape sliding distance, whereas the NiFe and CoZrTa poles exhibited growth in recession to about 30 and 40 nm, respectively, over the same sliding distance. The superior wear resistance and high saturation magnetization of FeAlN are ideal for high-density thin-film inductive heads.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    30
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
30
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!