
We formulate and solve a real-world shape design optimization problem of an air intake ventilation system in a tractor cabin by using a preference-based surrogate-assisted evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. We are motivated by practical applicability and focus on two main challenges faced by practitioners in industry: 1) meaningful formulation of the optimization problem reflecting the needs of a decision maker and 2) finding a desirable solution based on a decision maker's preferences when solving a problem with computationally expensive function evaluations. For the first challenge, we describe the procedure of modelling a component in the air intake ventilation system with commercial simulation tools. The problem to be solved involves time consuming computational fluid dynamics simulations. Therefore, for the second challenge, we extend a recently proposed Kriging-assisted evolutionary algorithm K-RVEA to incorporate a decision maker's preferences. Our numerical results indicate efficiency in using the computing resources available and the solutions obtained reflect the decision maker's preferences well. Actually, two of the solutions dominate the baseline design (the design provided by the decision maker before the optimization process). The decision maker was satisfied with the results and eventually selected one as the final solution.
Pareto optimality, ta113, mallintaminen, Päätöksen teko monitavoitteisesti, pareto-tehokkuus, ilmanvaihtojärjestelmät, Decision analytics utilizing causal models and multiobjective optimization, ta111, multiple criteria decision making, optimal shape design, metamodels, preference information, Multiobjective Optimization Group, monitavoiteoptimointi, Computational Science, koneoppiminen, evolutionary multi-objective optimization, computational costs, muoto, Laskennallinen tiede
Pareto optimality, ta113, mallintaminen, Päätöksen teko monitavoitteisesti, pareto-tehokkuus, ilmanvaihtojärjestelmät, Decision analytics utilizing causal models and multiobjective optimization, ta111, multiple criteria decision making, optimal shape design, metamodels, preference information, Multiobjective Optimization Group, monitavoiteoptimointi, Computational Science, koneoppiminen, evolutionary multi-objective optimization, computational costs, muoto, Laskennallinen tiede
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 9 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
