R2RML and RML Comparison for RDF Generation, their Rules Validation and Inconsistency Resolution
R2RML and RML Comparison for RDF Generation, their Rules Validation and Inconsistency Resolution
In this paper, an overview of the state of the art on knowledge graph generation is provided, with focus on the two prevalent mapping languages: the W3C recommended R2RML and its generalisation RML. We look into details on their differences and explain how knowledge graphs, in the form of RDF graphs, can be generated with each one of the two mapping languages. Then we assess if the vocabulary terms were properly applied to the data and no violations occurred on their use, either using R2RML or RML to generate the desired knowledge graph.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Databases, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Databases (cs.DB)
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI), Computer Science - Databases, Computer Science - Artificial Intelligence, Databases (cs.DB)
selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources.This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).0 popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.Average influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).Average impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.Average
Citations provided by BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!