
In the context of computational drug design, we examine the effectiveness of the enhanced sampling techniques in state-of-the-art free energy calculations based on alchemical molecular dynamics simulations. In a paradigmatic molecule with competition between conformationally restrained E and Z isomers whose probability ratio is strongly affected by the coupling with the environment, we compare the so-called λ-hopping technique to the Hamiltonian replica exchange methods assessing their convergence behavior as a function of the enhanced sampling protocols (number of replicas, scaling factors, simulation times). We found that the pure λ-hopping, commonly used in solvation and binding free energy calculations via alchemical free energy perturbation techniques, is ineffective in enhancing the sampling of the isomeric states, exhibiting a pathological dependence on the initial conditions. Correct sampling can be restored in λ-hopping simulation by the addition of a “hot-zone” scaling factor to the λ-stratification (FEP+ approach), provided that the additive hot-zone scaling factors are tuned and optimized using preliminary ordinary replica-exchange simulation of the end-states.
replica exchange, FEP; FEP+; binding free energy; drug design; molecular dynamics; replica exchange; solute tempering; Entropy; Thermodynamics; Molecular Dynamics Simulation, drug design, Entropy, FEP<sup>+</sup>, Organic chemistry, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, FEP, molecular dynamics, Article, drug design; molecular dynamics; binding free energy; replica exchange; FEP; FEP<sup>+</sup>; solute tempering, QD241-441, Thermodynamics, binding free energy
replica exchange, FEP; FEP+; binding free energy; drug design; molecular dynamics; replica exchange; solute tempering; Entropy; Thermodynamics; Molecular Dynamics Simulation, drug design, Entropy, FEP<sup>+</sup>, Organic chemistry, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, FEP, molecular dynamics, Article, drug design; molecular dynamics; binding free energy; replica exchange; FEP; FEP<sup>+</sup>; solute tempering, QD241-441, Thermodynamics, binding free energy
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
