Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

9 THE EFFICACY OF CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA SCREENING IN CALIFORNIA.

Authors: P. Fang; S. Banerjee;

9 THE EFFICACY OF CONGENITAL ADRENAL HYPERPLASIA SCREENING IN CALIFORNIA.

Abstract

Background Congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) is a congenital condition that could lead to serious adverse outcome in the newborn period if not detected early. In June 2005, California became the 40th state to add CAH to its screening panel. Because of the lack of uniformity in the methodology and cutoff values used among the states, it is necessary to investigate whether California9s Phase I CAH screening is effective in identifying the positive CAH cases with its current protocol. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of CAH screening in California. Method 23 newborns with initial positive CAH screening results were included in the study. Newborns were grouped based on final diagnoses: 21 newborns were CAH negative and 2 newborns were identified as CAH positive. The false-positive rate of the CAH screening test was used as a marker for test efficacy. Result 21 newborns were born prematurely and were diagnosed to be CAH negative. The correlation between birth weights and initial 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP) levels was -0.4512 (p = .0401) while the correlation between gestational ages and initial 17-OHP levels was -0.3648 (p = .1499). However, there was no correlation between age at collection and initial 17-OHP levels (r = -.0054, p = .9815). California9s CAH screening false-positive rate was 0.14%. Conclusion Birth weight is a better predictor for initial 17-OHP levels than gestational age California9s false-positive rate is comparable to those of other states that have CAH in their newborn screening panel. However, California may be able to further reduce its false-positive rate by adjusting the cutoff values for the low birth weight category

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!