
Advances in machine learning and wearable sensors offer new opportunities for capturing and analyzing human movement outside specialized laboratories. Accurately tracking and evaluating human movement under real-world conditions is essential for telemedicine, sports science, and rehabilitation. This work introduces a comprehensive benchmark comparing deep learning monocular video-based human pose estimation models with inertial measurement unit (IMU)-driven methods, leveraging VIDIMU dataset containing a total of 13 clinically relevant activities which were captured using both commodity video cameras and 5 IMUs. Joint angles derived from state-of-the-art deep learning frameworks (MotionAGFormer, MotionBERT, MMPose 2D-to-3D pose lifting, and NVIDIA BodyTrack included in Maxine-AR-SDK) were evaluated against joint angles computed from IMU data using OpenSim inverse kinematic methods. A graphical comparison of the angles estimated by each model shows the overall performance for each activity. The results, which also contains the evaluation of multiple metrics (RMSE, NMRSE, MAE, correlation and coefficient of determination) in table and plot format, highlight key trade-offs between video- and sensor-based approaches including costs, accessibility and precision across different daily life activities. This work establishes valuable guidelines for researchers and clinicians seeking to develop robust, cost-effective, and user-friendly solutions for telehealth and remote patient monitoring solutions, ultimately bridging the gap between AI-driven motion capture and accessible healthcare applications.
Human Pose Estimation, Deep Learning, Kinematic Assessment, Computer Vision, Biomechanics, IMU
Human Pose Estimation, Deep Learning, Kinematic Assessment, Computer Vision, Biomechanics, IMU
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
