Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Influence of diaphragmatic contraction on ventilation distribution in horizontal man

Authors: C S, Roussos; Y, Fukuchi; P T, Macklem; L A, Engel;

Influence of diaphragmatic contraction on ventilation distribution in horizontal man

Abstract

The washout of a bolus of helium (inhaled from residual volume) during relaxed expiration (RE) through a resistance was compared with that during expiration with voluntary diaphragmatic contraction (VDCE) achieved by tensing the abdominal muscles while maintaining constant expiratory flow (less than 0.4 l/s). In six subjects in the lateral decubitus position, phase IV during RE started at 58 +/- 1.6% vital capacity (VC) (mean +/- 1 SE). During VDCE, when the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) exceeded 30 cmH2O, phase IV commenced at 8.2 +/- 0.8% VC. The expired He concentration (FEHe) at lung volumes greater than 70% VC was 1.3 +/- 0.05 times that during RE. In supine subjects VDCE flattened the slope of the alveolar plateau and decreased closing volume by 3.7 +/- 0.4% VC. Our results suggest that when the diaphragm is relaxed in the horizontal subject, the hydrostatic gradient of pressure within the abdomen enhances early emptying of dependent lung zones. Diaphragmatic contraction results in more homogeneous emptying. We conclude that diaphragmatic tone influences the vertical gradient of regional volume, and hence of pleural pressure. The latter is not constant, being less during inspiration than during expiration. Therefore, differences in the changes of applied pressure between dependent and nondependent lung regions influence ventilation distribution in subjects in the horizontal posture.

Keywords

Residual Volume, Respiration, Diaphragm, Posture, Total Lung Capacity, Humans, Gases, Helium, Lung, Muscle Contraction

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    83
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
83
Top 10%
Top 1%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!