
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>The limit order book mechanism has been the core trading mechanism of the modern financial market. In the cryptocurrency market, centralized exchanges also adopt this limit order book mechanism and a centralized matching engine dynamically connects the traders to the orders of market makers. Recently, decentralized exchanges have been introduced and received considerable attention in the cryptocurrency community. A decentralized exchange typically adopts an automated market maker, which algorithmically arbitrates the trades between liquidity providers and traders through a pool of crypto assets. Meanwhile, the liquidity of the exchange is the most important factor when traders choose an exchange. However, the amount of liquidity provided by the liquidity providers in decentralized exchanges is insufficient when compared to centralized exchanges. This is because the liquidity providers in decentralized exchanges suffer from the risk of divergence loss inherent to the automated market making system. To this end, we introduce a new concept called margin liquidity and leverage this concept to propose a highly profitable margin liquidity-providing position. Then, we extend this margin liquidity-providing position to a virtual margin liquidity-providing position to alleviate the risk of divergence loss for the liquidity providers and encourage them to provide more liquidity to the pool. Furthermore, we introduce a representative strategy for the margin liquidity-providing position and backtest the strategy with historical data from the BTC/ETH market. Our strategy outperforms a simple holding baseline. We also show that our proposed margin liquidity is 8K times more capital efficient than the concentrated liquidity proposed in Uniswap V3.
Under review on ICBC23
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Computer Science - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE), FOS: Computer and information sciences, Computer Science - Cryptography and Security, Computer Science - Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science, Cryptography and Security (cs.CR)
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
