
In this article I will discuss an issue which must be raised in connection with the research program underlying much interesting recent work by Akmajian, Steele and Wasow (cf. Akmajian, Steele and Wasow (1979), henceforth ASW, and Steele et al. (1981), henceforth SEA).1 The goal of the program is to provide a framework in which the question of the similarity of categories across the grammars of particular languages can be provided with a ‘substantive empirical basis’: the framework uses cross-linguistic comparison to identify as equivalent, categories which are motivated in the first instance solely by language internal analyses. The treatment of the category AUX is intended to exemplify the general approach.2
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
