
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33426
pmid: 20583179
AbstractCytogenetically visible imbalances without phenotypic effect are still rare despite the extent of large‐scale copy number variation in the normal population revealed by array CGH. Here we report on a phenotypically normal 30‐year‐old female with a de novo, cytogenetically visible, interstitial deletion of band 4q34. She was referred following three successive miscarriages, one of which was an intra‐uterine death with subendocardial fibroelastosis and dilated cardiomyopathy. There was no other notable medical or family history, she was of normal intelligence and had no dysmorphic features. FISH and Array CGH with a customized 1 Mb BAC array showed that the deletion is a minimum of 9.3 and a maximum of 10.7 Mb in size, between ∼173 Mb in 4q34.1 and ∼182 Mb in 4q34.3. The deletion contains only 23 known coding genes giving a low average gene density of ∼2 genes/Mb. This case further illustrates that (1) sizeable imbalances can be associated with apparent phenotypic normality, (2) gene density is a better guide to possible phenotypic consequences than aberration size, and (3) it is not always safe to assume that de novo imbalances will be causal. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Male, 610, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosome Breakage, Chromosome Banding, Phenotype, Humans, Female, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, Child, Base Pairing, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
Adult, Male, 610, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosome Breakage, Chromosome Banding, Phenotype, Humans, Female, Chromosome Deletion, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 4, Child, Base Pairing, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
