
There is much widespread concern about “fake news” and other forms of misinformation, and how they can undermine democracies. Recent research has begun to focus on how fake news and misinformation is spread, and the factors that determine whether information is widely shared by users, thereby going viral. Here I explore why people believe and share information that they know to be false, a phenomenon known as participatory propaganda, and how this can give rise to cascades of misinformation in which ultimately many actors are unwitting participants. I review the limited literature on participatory propaganda and sketch some possible countermeasures to this relatively new phenomenon.
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog, 070, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog; name=TeDCog, name=Cognitive Science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science; name=Cognitive Science, name=TeDCog, 004
/dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog, 070, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/tedcog; name=TeDCog, name=Cognitive Science, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science; name=Cognitive Science, name=TeDCog, 004
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
