
Abstract Dual-tip phase-detection intrusive probes are the most widely used experimental technique for measuring interfacial velocities in highly aerated flows. Recently, we have introduced an adaptive window cross-correlation (AWCC) technique, which allows for the estimation of pseudo-instantaneous velocities and associated velocity statistics. Several potential limitations of this technique were suggested by Chanson (2020). In a direct response, the AWCC is clarified and shortcomings of conventional signal processing as well as general limitations of dual-tip phase-detection probes for velocity measurements are discussed. A comparison and validation of the AWCC against event detection techniques, image-based velocimetry and stochastic signals demonstrates the method’s novel opportunities for air–water flow research.
anzsrc-for: 40 Engineering, 4012 Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Engineering, anzsrc-for: 4012 Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Engineering, anzsrc-for: 09 Engineering, 40 Engineering, 620
anzsrc-for: 40 Engineering, 4012 Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Engineering, anzsrc-for: 4012 Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Engineering, anzsrc-for: 09 Engineering, 40 Engineering, 620
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
