
Introduction: In Portugal, a selective BCG vaccination strategy was adopted in January 2017. The efficacy of this strategy relies on the precise identification of high-risk groups. We designed a study to evaluate the implementation of the Portuguese guideline on BCG vaccination in the area of our hospital. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of a sample of children born in our hospital from January 2017 to June 2018. Data was collected through a telephone questionnaire. Results: There were 233 children included in the study. Of them, 46 (19.7%) were eligible for BCG immunization, most (82.6%) because they had a parent, cohabitant or frequent contact from a high-risk country. Of these eligible children, 21 (45.7%) had not been identified and were therefore unvaccinated. From the total sample, there were 38 vaccinated children, of which 47.4% were referred during the first month of age (age range of 0-20 months). Discussion: We identified 45.7% of unreferred high-risk children, a quarter of which with risk factors not often enquired - close contacts with substance abuse or HIV infection. About half of the parents denied or didn´t recall being asked about the criteria in our maternity or in further routine health consultations. Conclusions: The risk identification must be improved because a significant number of unreferred children was found. There is still a failure to reassess the risk in all routine visits and probably not all the risk criteria are excluded.
Portuguese Journal of Pediatrics, Vol. 52 No. 4 (2021)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
