
pmc: PMC7928622 , PMC7359528
AbstractSARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 are not phylogenetically closely related; however, both use the ACE2 receptor in humans for cell entry. This is not a universal sarbecovirus trait; for example, many known sarbecoviruses related to SARS-CoV-1 have two deletions in the receptor binding domain of the spike protein that render them incapable of using human ACE2. Here, we report three sequences of a novel sarbecovirus from Rwanda and Uganda which are phylogenetically intermediate to SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2 and demonstrate via in vitro studies that they are also unable to utilize human ACE2. Furthermore, we show that the observed pattern of ACE2 usage among sarbecoviruses is best explained by recombination not of SARS-CoV-2, but of SARS-CoV-1 and its relatives. We show that the lineage that includes SARS-CoV-2 is most likely the ancestral ACE2-using lineage, and that recombination with at least one virus from this group conferred ACE2 usage to the lineage including SARS-CoV-1 at some time in the past. We argue that alternative scenarios such as convergent evolution are much less parsimonious; we show that biogeography and patterns of host tropism support the plausibility of a recombination scenario; and we propose a competitive release hypothesis to explain how this recombination event could have occurred and why it is evolutionarily advantageous. The findings provide important insights into the natural history of ACE2 usage for both SARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2, and a greater understanding of the evolutionary mechanisms that shape zoonotic potential of coronaviruses. This study also underscores the need for increased surveillance for sarbecoviruses in southwestern China, where most ACE2-using viruses have been found to date, as well as other regions such as Africa, where these viruses have only recently been discovered.
570, viral ecology, Coronaviruses, 3102 Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (for-2020), Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, coronavirus, 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment (hrcs-rac), Microbiology, Lung (rcdc), Emerging Infectious Diseases (rcdc), Article, 0605 Microbiology (for), Pneumonia & Influenza (rcdc), 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment, Lung, virus evolution, Evolutionary Biology, 31 Biological Sciences (for-2020), 3107 Microbiology (for-2020), Coronaviruses (rcdc), Pneumonia, Biological Sciences, recombination, Infection (hrcs-hc), Emerging Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases, 0603 Evolutionary Biology (for), Infectious Diseases (rcdc), Pneumonia (rcdc), Pneumonia & Influenza, Infection, Research Article
570, viral ecology, Coronaviruses, 3102 Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (for-2020), Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, coronavirus, 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment (hrcs-rac), Microbiology, Lung (rcdc), Emerging Infectious Diseases (rcdc), Article, 0605 Microbiology (for), Pneumonia & Influenza (rcdc), 2.2 Factors relating to the physical environment, Lung, virus evolution, Evolutionary Biology, 31 Biological Sciences (for-2020), 3107 Microbiology (for-2020), Coronaviruses (rcdc), Pneumonia, Biological Sciences, recombination, Infection (hrcs-hc), Emerging Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases, 0603 Evolutionary Biology (for), Infectious Diseases (rcdc), Pneumonia (rcdc), Pneumonia & Influenza, Infection, Research Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 84 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
