
handle: 11368/3056674 , 11571/1464885
AbstractSeismic attenuation and the associated quality factor (Q) have long been studied in various sub-disciplines of seismology, ranging from observational and engineering seismology to near-surface geophysics and soil/rock dynamics with particular emphasis on geotechnical earthquake engineering and engineering seismology. Within the broader framework of seismic site characterization, various experimental techniques have been adopted over the years to measure the near-surface shear-wave quality factor (QS). Common methods include active- and passive-source recording techniques performed at the free surface of soil deposits and within boreholes, as well as laboratory tests. This paper intends to provide an in-depth review of whatQis and, in particular, howQSis estimated in the current practice. After motivating the importance of this parameter in seismology, we proceed by recalling various theoretical definitions ofQand its measurement through laboratory tests, considering various deformation modes, most notablyQPandQS. We next provide a review of the literature onQS estimation methods that use data from surface and borehole sensor recordings. We distinguish between active- and passive-source approaches, along with their pros and cons, as well as the state-of-the-practice and state-of-the-art. Finally, we summarize the phenomena associated with the high-frequency shear-wave attenuation factor (kappa) and its relation toQ, as well as other lesser-known attenuation parameters.
COSMOS guidelines; Near-surface; Site characterization; Quality factor; Attenuation, 550, COSMOS guideline, Near-surface, Site characterization, Attenuation, Quality factor
COSMOS guidelines; Near-surface; Site characterization; Quality factor; Attenuation, 550, COSMOS guideline, Near-surface, Site characterization, Attenuation, Quality factor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
