
pmid: 28190748
To determine the effect of frailty on patient outcomes including any complication, Clavien-Dindo IV (CDIV) (intensive care unit-level) complications, and 30-day mortality for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomies (RARP) patients in comparison to other predictive indices using the modified frailty index (mFI).Patients undergoing RARP from 2008 to 2014 for a prostate cancer-related diagnosis were queried using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database. The mFI was developed using the Canadian Study of Health and Aging Frailty Index as a model. The mFI was compared with other associative indices such as the American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification and the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI). Rates of CDIV complications and 30-day mortality were analyzed based on mFI score using SAS version 9.22.A total of 23,104 patients undergoing RARP were queried. RARP patients with the highest frailty score (≥3) had an adjusted odds for CDIV complications of Odds ratio of 12.107 (CI: 2.800-52.351, P< 0.005) in comparison with nonfrail RARP patients. These odds were higher than the ASA and Charlson comorbidity index. Additionally, a variable combining mFI and ASA had fair sensitivity and specificity for predicting 30-day mortality in RARP patients (C-statistic = 0.7097, P<0.0001).Increasing mFI scores are associated with worsening outcomes for patients undergoing RARP. A combined mFI and ASA variable can be used to predict 30-day mortality for RARP patients better than mFI or ASA alone.
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Prostatectomy, Frailty, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Assessment, Postoperative Complications, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Risk Factors, Humans, Aged, Retrospective Studies
Aged, 80 and over, Male, Prostatectomy, Frailty, Prostatic Neoplasms, Risk Assessment, Postoperative Complications, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Risk Factors, Humans, Aged, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 49 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
