
pmid: 9359902
We have examined the effects of co-expression of Kvbeta1.1 and Kvbeta2.1 subunits on the gating of rat brain Kv1.4 channels, expressed in Xenopus oocytes. Expression of Kv1.4 subunits alone produced a rapidly inactivating "A" type current, which activated at potentials beyond -60 mV in a solution containing high levels of rubidium. Current activation curves obtained from tail current measurements were fitted with a Boltzmann function, with V1/2 = -47 mV and k = 10 mV. Neither the Kvbeta1.1 nor Kvbeta2.1 subunits altered the voltage dependence of activation. Both subunits accelerated the activation time constant of Kv1.4, without affecting its voltage dependence. Surprisingly, the Kvbeta2.1 subunit, which lacks an N-terminal inactivation domain, was almost as effective as the Kvbeta1.1 subunit in speeding up Kv1.4. Steady-state inactivation of Kv1.4 was unchanged upon co-expression with either Kvbeta1.1 or Kvbeta2.1 subunits. Kv1.4 recovered from inactivation with two time constants; apart from an approximately 50% lengthening of the slow time constant with a high Kvbeta2.1 injection ratio, neither time constant was altered by either the Kvbeta1.1 or Kvbeta2.1 subunits, suggesting little interaction with recovery from C-type inactivation. Clearly, beta subunits have the potential to modify the gating of Kv1.4 channels in the brain more subtly than has been suggested previously.
Potassium Channels, Electric Conductivity, Gene Expression, Recombinant Proteins, Membrane Potentials, RNA, Complementary, Rats, Xenopus laevis, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Oocytes, Animals, Kv1.4 Potassium Channel, Female, Ion Channel Gating
Potassium Channels, Electric Conductivity, Gene Expression, Recombinant Proteins, Membrane Potentials, RNA, Complementary, Rats, Xenopus laevis, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Oocytes, Animals, Kv1.4 Potassium Channel, Female, Ion Channel Gating
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
