
doi: 10.1038/mp.2010.38
pmid: 20351714
Data from the Genetic Association Information Network (GAIN) genome-wide association study (GWAS) in major depressive disorder (MDD) were used to explore previously reported candidate gene and single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations in MDD. A systematic literature search of candidate genes associated with MDD in case-control studies was performed before the results of the GAIN MDD study became available. Measured and imputed candidate SNPs and genes were tested in the GAIN MDD study encompassing 1738 cases and 1802 controls. Imputation was used to increase the number of SNPs from the GWAS and to improve coverage of SNPs in the candidate genes selected. Tests were carried out for individual SNPs and the entire gene using different statistical approaches, with permutation analysis as the final arbiter. In all, 78 papers reporting on 57 genes were identified, from which 92 SNPs could be mapped. In the GAIN MDD study, two SNPs were associated with MDD: C5orf20 (rs12520799; P=0.038; odds ratio (OR) AT=1.10, 95% CI 0.95-1.29; OR TT=1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.47) and NPY (rs16139; P=0.034; OR C allele=0.73, 95% CI 0.55-0.97), constituting a direct replication of previously identified SNPs. At the gene level, TNF (rs76917; OR T=1.35, 95% CI 1.13-1.63; P=0.0034) was identified as the only gene for which the association with MDD remained significant after correction for multiple testing. For SLC6A2 (norepinephrine transporter (NET)) significantly more SNPs (19 out of 100; P=0.039) than expected were associated while accounting for the linkage disequilibrium (LD) structure. Thus, we found support for involvement in MDD for only four genes. However, given the number of candidate SNPs and genes that were tested, even these significant may well be false positives. The poor replication may point to publication bias and false-positive findings in previous candidate gene studies, and may also be related to heterogeneity of the MDD phenotype as well as contextual genetic or environmental factors.
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), replication, PubMed, MOOD DISORDERS, Genotype, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, KOREAN POPULATION, PROMOTER POLYMORPHISM, Linkage Disequilibrium, FUNCTIONAL POLYMORPHISM, ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT, GLUCOCORTICOID-RECEPTOR GENE, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Gene Frequency, single nucleotide polymorphism, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, Odds Ratio, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Neuropeptide Y, ALPHA-GENE, INCREASED RISK, SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER GENE, Depressive Disorder, Major, genome-wide association study, Norepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, major depressive disorder, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Computational Biology, ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE, candidate genes, Genome-Wide Association Study
Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), replication, PubMed, MOOD DISORDERS, Genotype, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, KOREAN POPULATION, PROMOTER POLYMORPHISM, Linkage Disequilibrium, FUNCTIONAL POLYMORPHISM, ANTIDEPRESSANT TREATMENT, GLUCOCORTICOID-RECEPTOR GENE, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, Gene Frequency, single nucleotide polymorphism, single-nucleotide polymorphisms, Odds Ratio, Humans, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Neuropeptide Y, ALPHA-GENE, INCREASED RISK, SEROTONIN TRANSPORTER GENE, Depressive Disorder, Major, genome-wide association study, Norepinephrine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins, major depressive disorder, Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha, Computational Biology, ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE, candidate genes, Genome-Wide Association Study
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 263 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
