
doi: 10.1118/1.595949
pmid: 3784996
Monte Carlo calculations of radiation dosimetry using morse code are performed for 125I and 60Co point sources in a cylindrical head phantom that simulates the geometry of eye plaque therapy for choroidal melanoma. We obtain the dose variation in the eye at submillimeter intervals over distances as close as 1 mm and up to 2.5 cm from the source. The calculations for 125I are performed for the phantom media of water, protein, and a homogenized protein–water mixture simulating the composition of the eye. Relative dose functions for 125I for these phantom media are fitted to second‐degree polynomials. Agreement is found with published results. The relative dose function for 60Co at eye position in the water head phantom is fitted to a third‐degree polynomial and compared with that for 60Co at the center of a large water sphere. A boundary effect due to the head phantom–air interface on the dose distribution for 60Co is demonstrated. The dose falloff with distance is faster for the eye geometry compared with the bulk geometry. We also show that the relative dose distributions within the tumor are comparable for 125I and 60Co by comparing their relative dose functions. This result is consistent with the success of clinical trials of large melanoma treatments with 125I plaques.
Iodine Radioisotopes, Models, Anatomic, Choroid Neoplasms, Biophysics, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Melanoma, Monte Carlo Method, Biophysical Phenomena
Iodine Radioisotopes, Models, Anatomic, Choroid Neoplasms, Biophysics, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Cobalt Radioisotopes, Melanoma, Monte Carlo Method, Biophysical Phenomena
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 37 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
