
pmid: 28466520
After more than a quarter century of dialysis, two factors are still present in dialysis treatment of chronic renal failure patients: inadequacy of technology (the artificial kidney acts as an artificial glomerulus) and inadequate use of technology in terms of dialysis initiation and frequency. This paper presents the results of two less unphysiological dialysis programs, introduced in Bologna at the beginning of the 1960s, which proved their clinical value and are now becoming trendy, at the end of this century. Features of these programs are twofold: (1) daily dialysis, which aims at making treatment more biologically suited to the patient; its validity relies on lower intra‐ and interdialytic osmotic fluctuations; (2) early dialysis, which aims at making the patient more biologically suited to the treatment. After more than 25 years it is evident that this treatment has fulfilled its original expectations versus late dialysis. There is a 40% improvement in survival, a 35% decrease in morbidity, and a 24% improvement in the cost/benefit ratio.This report is based on a retrospective analysis of our overall experience and clinical results of chronic hemodialysis carried out in 224 patients on early dialysis and 1210 patients on late dialysis in Bologna from 1967 to 1997. Based on this experience, the following should be regarded as particularly important indications for early dialysis: adequate dialysis facilities; symptomatic patients despite renal creatinine clearances between 15 and 20 mL/min; patients unable to comply with dietary measures; children, to allow for adequate development; patients with diabetes mellitus; candidates for renal transplantation.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
